The Medicine-Men of the Apache. (1892 N 09 / 1887-1888 (pages 443-604))
Edition facts
John G. Bourke's The Medicine-Men of the Apache (1892) moves between detailed descriptions of Apache ceremonial objects and wide-ranging comparisons to practices from ancient Egypt to medieval Europe. The work is structured as a catalog of material culture—necklaces of human fingers, medicine cords, pollen pouches—each item serving as a springboard for tracing analogous beliefs across cultures. Bourke, a U.S. Army captain, draws on firsthand observation and extensive reading, but his method is associative rather than systematic, linking the Apache hoddentin (pollen) to Aztec yiauhtli and Good Friday buns in a single chapter.
Recurring Objects and Their Cultural Webs
Bourke organizes his study around tangible items: the izze-kloth (medicine cord), the rhombus or bull roarer, the scratch stick and drinking reed, and the tzi-daltai amulets. Each object receives a dedicated section that first describes its Apache use—often with illustrations referenced in the plates—then expands into a cross-cultural survey. For instance, the medicine cord is compared to Aztec, Peruvian, Lapp, Parsi, and Brahman cord traditions. This structure creates a web of analogies that can feel sprawling; Bourke does not always distinguish between direct influence, independent invention, or superficial resemblance. The reader must weigh the evidence he presents, which is drawn from ethnographies, classical texts, and folklore collections.
Hoddentin and the Logic of Sacred Powders
Chapter II centers on hoddentin, the pollen of the tule, which Bourke calls “the sacrificial powder of the Apache.” He traces its use in Apache ceremonies—sprinkled, offered, worn—and then catalogs analogous substances: the kunque of the Zuñi, the yiauhtli of the Aztecs, bird down, hair powder, dust from churches, and even the clay eaten by some peoples. The chapter culminates in a discussion of sacred breads and cakes, from Parsi draona to hot cross buns. Bourke’s method is accumulative: he piles examples to suggest a universal human impulse to consecrate food and powder, but the connections are often asserted rather than argued. The reader may note how the same pollen appears in multiple contexts, yet Bourke does not explain its specific symbolic meaning for the Apache.
The Medicine Cord and Its Analogues
The izze-kloth receives a chapter of its own, where Bourke describes cords of one to four strands, each with specific ceremonial uses. He then moves to analogous objects: the “magic wind-knotted cords” of the Lapps, rosaries, mnemonic cords of the Parsis and Brahmans, and cords used in parturition across cultures. The section includes a discussion of “measuring cords” and “wresting threads,” drawing on European folklore. Bourke’s treatment is descriptive rather than analytical; he rarely speculates on why cords carry such power. The reader is left to observe the recurrence of knots, measurements, and binding in rituals worldwide, but the Apache-specific meaning of the izze-kloth remains somewhat opaque, as Bourke focuses more on its analogues than on its role in Apache healing.
Movement Between Ethnography and Comparative Lore
Throughout the work, Bourke shifts between firsthand accounts—often attributed to Apache informants or his own observations—and lengthy quotations from published sources. This movement creates a layered text: the reader encounters a description of a scalp shirt or a medicine hat, then a digression on similar items in other cultures. The effect is encyclopedic but can be disorienting. For example, the chapter on sacred powders ends with a discussion of unleavened bread and hot cross buns, citing Brand’s Popular Antiquities. Bourke does not always signal whether he considers these parallels evidence of diffusion or of universal symbolism. The structure invites the reader to draw their own conclusions, but the lack of a unifying thesis means the work reads more as a cabinet of curiosities than as a focused ethnography.
Bourke’s study rewards readers who approach it as a document of late-nineteenth-century comparative method rather than as a systematic account of Apache medicine. The recurring images—pollen, cords, cakes, amulets—trace a network of associations that reveal as much about Bourke’s intellectual world as about Apache culture. To navigate the text, attend to the objects themselves and the way Bourke moves from the specific to the universal, often leaving the Apache context behind. The illustrations and plate references are essential anchors.